Beta
16796

Invasive and Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation For Acute Exacerbations Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Study.

Article

Last updated: 24 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Introduction: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent cause of hospitalization and intensive care unit admission. Respiratory failure from airflow obstruction is a direct consequenceof acute airway narrowing.Aim of the study: It was to compare the efficacy of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) against conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Patients and methods: Forty patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were recruited in the present study. A comparative, hospital based study design was used. All the cases were examined; clinically and laboratory. The patients were divided into two groups each include 20 patients. Group A received NIMV in the form of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and group B with CMV. Results: There were statistically significant decreases in respiratory rate, heart rate and diastolic blood pressure after 6 hours of CPAP in comparison to baseline parameters in group A. While, there were statistically significant increases in PaO2 and SaO2 after 6 hours of CPAP in comparison to baseline parameters. In group B there were statistically significant decreases in respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure after 6 hours of CMV in comparison to baseline parameters. While, there were statistically significant increases in pH, PaO2, and SaO2 and a statistically significant decrease in PaCO2 after 6 hours of CMV in comparison to baseline parameters. Further, comparison of respiratory rate and hemodynamic parameters in both groups showed statistically significant decreases in respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in group A in comparison to group B. Finally, failure rate was 35.0% in group A (NIMV) compared to 5.0% in group B (CMV) with statistically significant difference. Conclusions and recommendations: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation is a safe and effective means of improving gas exchange in patients with acute exacerbations of CPPD. If patient not respond to NIMV, CMV should be used. Further studies are needed to evaluate the appropriate selection of patients and to find the best level and schedule of ventilation.

DOI

10.21608/ejhm.2011.16796

Authors

First Name

Abd-Hay I.

Last Name

Abd-Hay

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Departments of Chest, Anesthesia Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Ahmed S.

Last Name

Alsaily

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Departments of Chest, Anesthesia Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Essam A.

Last Name

El-Moselhy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

dr.elmoselhy@azhar.edu.eg

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

42

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

3558

Issue Date

2011-01-01

Receive Date

2018-10-16

Publish Date

2011-01-01

Page Start

50

Page End

63

Print ISSN

1687-2002

Online ISSN

2090-7125

Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_16796.html

Detail API

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=16796

Order

5

Type

Original Article

Type Code

606

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

Publication Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Invasive and Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation For Acute Exacerbations Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Study.

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023