t It is clear to us that the prevailing opinion is Sharia and a law according to which it is forbidden to dispose of the human body as a means of netting. The human right to his body is not considered a financial right. A human being can not obtain any consideration for the removal of any member of his body. The human body must not be allowed to be harmed for any reason. Determined by law. That the principle of free (donation) when dealing with the human body, is a principle of importance so that it can protect the person from the weakness of himself in front of the temptation of material, or to live, and the need, if he wanted to give up one of its members, will not be motivated to fight it Purely human. If this is the general origin, there are exceptions to this principle (including compensation of the donor for the expenses incurred by him because he has given up a member or his body) _ and these exceptions must be in the case of urgent necessity, The availability of certain controls and conditions, and within the limits at which this action is aimed at achieving a purely humanitarian objective, has not been linked to close security and distant security to any commercial objective or objective. I believe that this is not to say that we should strive to establish a legal system for the human body. This legal system must be protected by criminal and civil rules that deter anyone who wishes to take the human body, its dignity, its humanness and its freedom. Otherwise, there is no value for any study or legal research. Its main purpose is to protect and protect human beings