Beta
169665

Assessment of the Value of Review of Pathology Material by a Second Pathologist

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

In many pathology departments, some cases are reviewed routinely by a second pathologist within the same department before sign-out. The value of this practice is not known. This study reviewed and compared the disagreement and amendment rates for cases reviewed by 1 or more pathologists based on the results of blind review. A total of 4,181 cases underwent blind review, and of these, 543 [13.0%] were reviewed by more than 1 pathologist before sign-out. The disagreement rate for cases reviewed by more than 1 pathologist was 4.8% and this was significantly lower than for cases reviewed by only 1 pathologist which was 6.9% [P=0.004]. The amendment rate was 0.0% and 0.5%, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant [P=0.12]. Review of material by a second pathologist before sign-out is associated with a lower disagreement rate. These results suggest that second review of surgical pathology is of value, but the best selection of cases to be reviewed remains to be defined.

DOI

10.21608/jhiph.2005.169665

Keywords

Pathology, Diagnosis, Slide Revision

Authors

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Shalaby

MiddleName

M R.

Affiliation

Oncologic Pathology Department, Damanhour National Medicine Institute, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

35

Article Issue

4

Related Issue

24095

Issue Date

2005-10-01

Receive Date

2021-05-09

Publish Date

2005-10-01

Page Start

897

Page End

902

Print ISSN

2357-0601

Online ISSN

2357-061X

Link

https://jhiphalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_169665.html

Detail API

https://jhiphalexu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=169665

Order

9

Type

Original Article

Type Code

511

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Journal of High Institute of Public Health

Publication Link

https://jhiphalexu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023