Beta
165975

Outcome of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion with Instrumentation in Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disorders

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

Degenerative

Abstract

Background Data: Degenerative lumbar spine disorders are common pathologies that usually affect females in their sixth decade or older. Patients usually present with various symptoms, including back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication, among other less common presentations. Different fusion procedures are available to manage these problems. Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) in managing degenerative lumbar disorders. Study Design: A prospective study. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent lumbar spine fixation with either TLIF or PLF. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the operative procedure: Group A (20 patients) underwent TLIF and Group B (20 patients) underwent PLF. Patients were followed up and assessed for back and leg pain, functional disability, and spinal fusion. Results: We found that both TLIF and PLF improve disability and pain in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. TLIF was found to be superior to PLF as regards achieving radiographic outcomes. We did not find strong evidence to support the use of interbody fusion along with transpedicular fixation compared to traditional posterolateral fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders, taking into consideration the higher material costs added with interbody fusion. Conclusion: The reported data in the present study suggest that both TLIF and PLF provide improvement of disability and pain in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. They also suggest that TLIF is superior to PLF when comparing the achievement of radiographic fusion. However, there is no significant clinical outcome difference to recommend using TLIF over traditional PLF in treating degenerative lumbar disorders, especially with the higher treatment costs related to the use of interbody fusion. (2020ESJ217)

DOI

10.21608/esj.2021.50482.1156

Keywords

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Posterolateral lumbar fusion, Degenerative lumbar disc disease, Spondylolisthesis

Authors

First Name

Hatem

Last Name

Sabry

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Neurosurgery Dept Ain Shams University

Email

sabrymd@gmail.com

City

-

Orcid

0000-0001-6101-9061

First Name

Salah

Last Name

Hemida

MiddleName

A

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

salahhemeda6@hotmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Khaled

Last Name

Saoud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

ksaoud@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

0000-0003-0633-0206

First Name

Emad

Last Name

Abouelmaaty

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

emadhamza@med.asu.edu.eg

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

36

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

19958

Issue Date

2020-10-01

Receive Date

2020-11-20

Publish Date

2020-10-01

Page Start

24

Page End

36

Print ISSN

2314-8950

Online ISSN

2314-8969

Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_165975.html

Detail API

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=165975

Order

165,975

Type

Clinical Articles

Type Code

433

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Spine Journal

Publication Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023