Beta
93884

Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease (CDD): Clinical and Radiographic Outcome

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

Degenerative

Abstract

Background Data: In spite of being successful, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF has some complications, among them, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, and adjacent level disease. Dynamic Cervical Implants (DCI) are motion-preserving implants started to take part in treating cervical spondylotic disease with promising results.
Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of ACDF versus DCI in patients with degenerativecervical radiculo- and/or myelopathy.
Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled study.
Patients and Methods: Forty patients with cervical spondylotic radiculo- and/or myelopathy were recruited for this study. They were 21 males and 19 females with mean age of 45±8.9 years. They were randomly allocated for either the ACDF group including 20 patients undergoing ACDF using PEEK cages or the DCI group including 20 patients using DCI. Clinical outcome parameters were brachialgia VAS and NDI, and radiological outcome parameters were fusion rate, adjacent level changes, and segmental mobility.
Results: The mean follow-up was 20±4 months. The mean VAS of brachialgia decreased from 8.7 preoperatively to 6.6 postoperatively in ACDF group, while it decreased from 8.8 to 6.4 in DCI with no significant differences in both groups. The mean NDI improved from 24.7±1.6 to 16.2±1.8 in ACDF group and from 23.9±2.1 to 15.8±2.0 in DCI group, with no significant difference in both groups. Fusin rate was 100% in ACDF group. Radiologically, adjacent level changes were reported in 5 (25%) patients in ACDF group, while these changes were only observed in 1 patient (5%) of the DCI group. Segmental mobility was preserved in all patients in the DCI group but was lost in 3 patients at final follow-up visit.
Conclusion: Although clinical outcomes of both ACDF and DCI groups were not significantly different at final follow-up, radiographic parameters were relatively better in DCI group compared to ACDF group including segmental mobility preservation and adjacent level changes. (2019ESJ198)

DOI

10.21608/esj.2020.21585.1117

Keywords

ACDF, DCI, Cervical spondylosis, Radiculopathy, Myelopathy

Authors

First Name

Mahmoud

Last Name

Wahdan

MiddleName

M

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery Faculty of medicine Benha university

Email

drwahdan@hotmail.com

City

Benha

Orcid

-

First Name

Ramy

Last Name

Taema

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Benha university neurosurgery department

Email

ramytaema82@gmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Moataz

Last Name

Elawady,

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Neurosurgery Department,Benha University

Email

mawadi@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

33

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

12816

Issue Date

2020-01-01

Receive Date

2019-11-18

Publish Date

2020-01-01

Page Start

45

Page End

53

Print ISSN

2314-8950

Online ISSN

2314-8969

Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_93884.html

Detail API

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=93884

Order

4

Type

Clinical Articles

Type Code

433

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Spine Journal

Publication Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023