Beta
26431

Anchored Spacers Versus Standalone Cages in Two Levels Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease; A Comparative Study

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background Data: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been standard procedure in treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. In order to reduce risks associated with traditional methods of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion a new zero profile cage with screws has been introduced and widely used.
Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two levels ACDF using stand-alone peek cage and zero profile anchored cage with screws.
Study Design: Two groups of patients were enrolled in this study; Group A involving 30 consecutive patients that underwent two levels ACDF using standalone peek cages, and Group B including 30 patients that underwent two levels ACDF with zero-profile anchored cage with screws.
Patients and Methods: Both surgical groups were assessed clinically involving neck and arm pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), neck disability index and Nurick score. Radiological evaluation involved the changes in vertebral heights (VH), both segmental (Cobb-s) and global (Cobb-c) Cobb angle and fusion rates via plain X-ray cervical spine that was done pre-operative, immediate post-operative and at 24 months post-operative.
Results: The neck disability index and the Nurick score together with both VAS for neck and arm pain were significantly improved after surgery with no statistical difference between both groups. All patients in both groups showed satisfactory fusion rates except two patients in Group A. Both groups showed early marked increase in the VH followed later by cage subsidence that was significantly higher in Group A patients. In both groups; Cobb-c, and Cobb-s angles were significantly increased in the immediate postoperative compared to the preoperative measures. Terminal measures for both Cobb-c and Cobb-s, at 24 months follow up images, in both groups worsened but to a statistically significant lesser extent in Group B compared to Group A.Conclusion: The zero-profile anchored cage with screws compared to stand-alone peek cage was effective treatment for cervical disc disorders in two levels cervical discectomy and fusion and their results showed better result regarding the incidence of cage subsidence and maintaining cervical lordosis. (2018ESJ169)

DOI

10.21608/esj.2019.5408.1068

Keywords

Anchored spacer, cervical cage, degenerative spine, cervical discectomy

Authors

First Name

Osama

Last Name

Dawood

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

osdawood@hotmail.com

City

-

Orcid

0000-0002-8530-7145

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Toubar

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, .Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hisham

Last Name

Anwer

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

hishambando@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Aziz

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

28

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

4752

Issue Date

2018-10-01

Receive Date

2018-06-02

Publish Date

2018-10-01

Page Start

13

Page End

24

Print ISSN

2314-8950

Online ISSN

2314-8969

Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_26431.html

Detail API

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=26431

Order

2

Type

Clinical Articles

Type Code

433

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Spine Journal

Publication Link

https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023