Beta
5337

Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment in elderly patients: A pilot study

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is a major health related concern associated with higher morbidity and mortality in the elderly compared to their younger counterparts. Malnutrition is not an inevitable side effect of ageing, but many changes related to ageing can cause malnutrition. The early recognition of patients at high risk of malnutrition is needed to timely manage the condition and avoid its adverse outcomes. Several types of nutrition screening tools have been developed for evaluating the nutritional status of elders; however, the Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) is the most widely used tool. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify the most appropriate nutritional screening tool for use in hospitalized elderly population. Method: Mini-Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), The Nutritional risk screening (NRS), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) were administered to 20 patients. All patients were 60 years and over. Results: Using the MNA-SF 12 (60%) of the studied sample were malnourished and 8 (40%) had normal nutritional status. Tools performance in predicting malnutrition was calculated. The sensitivity was 91%, 83%, 83% and 66% and specificity was 50%, 62%, 12% and 75% with the NRS, MUST, PG-SGA and GNRI, respectively. Combining different pairs of tools MUST and NRS together had better sensitivity 92.8% and specificity 66.6% then 2nd better two tools together is NRS and GNRI with sensitivity 91.6% and specificity 50% with accuracy 75% other tools showed high sensitivity but low specificity as PGSGA with NRS and PGSGA and GNRI. Conclusion: NRS had the highest sensitivity while GNRI had the highest specificity among different studied assessment tools. MUST and NRS together had better sensitivity but lower specificity than either tool alone. Combining the NRS and GNRI had better sensitivity than GNRI alone and better specificity than NRS alone. We recommend using NRS alone as the optimal screening tool.

DOI

10.21608/ejgg.2014.5337

Keywords

Malnutrition, elderly nutritional status, nutritional assessment tools

Authors

First Name

Nesma

Last Name

Ahmed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Lecturer of Geriatrics; Geriatrics and Gerontology Department; Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Menna

Last Name

Shawkat

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Lecturer of Geriatrics; Geriatrics and Gerontology Department; Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Marian

Last Name

Mansour

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Lecturer of Geriatrics; Geriatrics and Gerontology Department; Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hazem

Last Name

Hussien

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Lecturer of Geriatrics; Geriatrics and Gerontology Department; Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Doha

Last Name

Rasheedy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Lecturer of Geriatrics; Geriatrics and Gerontology Department; Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams university, Cairo, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

1

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

910

Issue Date

2014-03-01

Receive Date

2018-02-15

Publish Date

2014-03-01

Page Start

53

Page End

59

Print ISSN

2356-8712

Online ISSN

2536-9792

Link

https://ejgg.journals.ekb.eg/article_5337.html

Detail API

https://ejgg.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=5337

Order

8

Type

Original Article

Type Code

365

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology

Publication Link

https://ejgg.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023