Beta
4390

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN I-GEL VERSUS CUFFED ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES IN ADULT PATIENTS

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Invention of the endotracheal tube made administration of anesthesia easy. However, laryngoscopic stimulation of oropharyngolaryngeal structures is associated with hemodynamic stress response. Recently, the I-gel has been invented. It is a new 2nd generation supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff which has several potential advantages including: easier insertion, minimal risk of tissue compression and stability after insertion. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the I-gel to the cuffed endotracheal tube in laparoscopic surgeries in adult patients. Patients and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial among 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures. They were equally divided into two groups: I-gel and cuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) groups. Both the devices were compared as regards insertion characteristics, hemodynamic stability, gas exchange parameters, peak airway pressure changes and the incidence of postoperative complications. Results: No significant statistical difference between the two groups was found regarding heart rate, O2 saturation, end tidal CO2 and peak airway pressure changes. Regarding mean arterial blood pressure, it was more stable after insertion in the I-gel group (P=0.019). There was also significant difference in the insertion time (P=0.0029) and number of insertion attempts (P=0.04) between the two groups. Regarding ease of insertion of gastric tube, it was easier to be inserted in the ETT group (P=0.0001). The postoperative complications were higher in the ETT group; for dysphagia (P=0.0002), dysphonia (P=0.0007), nausea (P=0.0019), vomiting (P=0.00017). However, there was no difference in the presence of blood on the device (P=0.396). Conclusion: I-gel is a safe airway device during the laparoscopic procedures. It was better than the cuffed ETT regarding hemodynamic stability changes after insertion without affecting gas exchange parameters. Although the complications were higher in the ETT group but the gastric tube insertion was more difficult in the I-gel group.

DOI

10.21608/zumj.2014.4390

Keywords

Airway management, I-gel, Laparoscpic surgeries, Endotracheal tube

Authors

First Name

Samia

Last Name

Massoud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care,Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Dalal

Last Name

Soud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care,Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Khaled

Last Name

Helmy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care,Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Elsayed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care ,Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

20

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

733

Issue Date

2014-05-01

Receive Date

2017-12-05

Publish Date

2014-05-01

Page Start

1

Page End

8

Print ISSN

1110-1431

Online ISSN

2357-0717

Link

https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/article_4390.html

Detail API

https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=4390

Order

2

Type

Original Article

Type Code

273

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Zagazig University Medical Journal

Publication Link

https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023