Beta
78265

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Fetal Anomalies

Article

Last updated: 01 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Three dimensional ultrasound is the standard modality used for the imaging of the fetus. It is widely available, easy to apply, cost-effective, safe for the fetus and allows real-time imaging. MR imaging is an alternative modality that uses no ionizing radiation, has excellent tissue contrast and a large field of view, is not limited by obesity or overlying bone, and can image the fetus in multiple planes, no matter the fetal lie. This study was carried out on 40 patients which have been suspected by 2D ultrasound as having fetal malformations. Post-natal evaluation was done by both imaging (2D ultrasound and X-ray) and clinical examination, it was a criterion for our study to compare the accuracy of 3D ultrasonography and MR imaging in diagnosis of fetal malformations.
Aim of Study: To compare the precision and accuracy of 3D ultrasonography and MR imaging in diagnosis of fetal malformations and correlate their results with the postnatal findings.
Patients and Methods: This prospective study included fourty (40) pregnant female patients which have been suspected by 2D ultrasound as having fetal malformations.
Results: We have found that 7 cases of all patients were diagnosed as normal with no any congenital anomalies which represented 18% of all cases and 33 of those cases were diagnosed as abnormal cases who were clearly demonstrated congenital anomalies which represented 82% of all cases as suggested by MRI findings, however the results we have by 3D US were 6 cases who were diagnosed as normal which represented about 15% and 34 cases were diagnosed as ab-normal cases which represented about 85% of all cases.
According to the postnatal final diagnosis which diagnosed by imaging or clinical examination, we have found that 8 cases from 40 cases were diagnosed as normal and 32 cases from 40 cases were diagnosed as abnormal.
Conclusion: MR imaging as an adjunct to prenatal 3D US may provide valuable information that could add to the prenatal evaluation and treatment of some fetal anomalies, particularly those involving the central nervous system.

DOI

10.21608/mjcu.2019.78265

Keywords

3D Ultrasound – MRI – Fetus, Malformations – Congenital – Anomalies

Authors

First Name

ATINAS A.M.A. KANDIL, M.Sc.;

Last Name

MAHMOUD A. DAWOOD, M.D.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

HAYTHAM H. ELSAEED, M.D.;

Last Name

NOHA M.A. IBRAHIM, M.D.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

The Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

87

Article Issue

December

Related Issue

11480

Issue Date

2019-12-01

Receive Date

2019-03-20

Publish Date

2019-12-01

Page Start

4,457

Page End

4,466

Print ISSN

0045-3803

Online ISSN

2536-9806

Link

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/article_78265.html

Detail API

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=78265

Order

56

Type

Original Article

Type Code

263

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Medical Journal of Cairo University

Publication Link

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Fetal Anomalies

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023