Beta
65633

Comparison between Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Post-Date Pregnancy

Article

Last updated: 01 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Post-date pregnancy is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Therefore post-date pregnancy is considered as a high-risk condition which requires specialist surveillance and induction of labor at some stage. The aim of this work is to evaluate if a policy of induction of labor at 41 GW is superior, in terms of neonatal and maternal outcomes, as compared to expectant management in healthy women with a low risk singleton pregnancy.
Aim of Study: The aim with this study is to evaluate if a policy of induction of labor at 41 GW is superior, in terms of neonatal and maternal outcomes, as compared to expectant management in healthy women with a low risk singleton pregnancy.
Patients and Methods: A prospective case control study A total number of 100 pregnant women will be included in the study divided into 2 groups: Group (1): Consists of 50 pregnant women who undergo induction of labor at 41 + 0 or 41 + 1 weeks. Group (2): Consists of 50 women who undergo expectant management await spontaneous onset of labor until 42 weeks.
Results: This study shows that Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) was significantly associated with expectant group as 14% of this group had it in their children while only 2% in the induction group, also shows that there are no significant difference between the two groups regarding other perinatal outcomes also shows that rate of CS was significantly associated with induction group 34% while the rate of CS in expectant group only 16%, also the rate of using analgesia was significantly associated with induction group 44% while only 22% in expectant group.
Conclusion: Labor induction at 41 completed weeks should be offered to low risk women. The message from this review is that such a policy is associated with fewer deaths although the absolute risk is small. However, this policy may increase the rate of CS or need of analgesia.

DOI

10.21608/mjcu.2019.65633

Keywords

Post-date pregnancy, induction of labor, Post-term pregnancy

Authors

First Name

MOHAMMED A. MOHAMMED, M.Sc.;

Last Name

FARID I. HASSAN, M.D.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

WAEL S. TAHA, M.D.;

Last Name

RAGHDAA M. ALI, M.D.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University* and The Department of Neonatology, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, GOTHI**

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

87

Article Issue

September

Related Issue

8905

Issue Date

2019-09-01

Receive Date

2018-01-20

Publish Date

2019-09-01

Page Start

3,375

Page End

3,380

Print ISSN

0045-3803

Online ISSN

2536-9806

Link

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/article_65633.html

Detail API

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=65633

Order

79

Type

Original Article

Type Code

263

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Medical Journal of Cairo University

Publication Link

https://mjcu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Comparison between Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Post-Date Pregnancy

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023