Beta
77233

Effect of Impression Materials and Techniques on Impressions Accuracy for Angulated Implants

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Purpose: Reproducing the intraoral relationship of implants through impression procedures is the first step in achieving an accurate, passively fitting prosthesis. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of three different impression materials, polyether (PE, ImpregumTMSoft ), additional silicone (PVS, Enthus) and vinyl siloxanether (VSXE, EXA'lence), on the accuracy of impressions in nonparallel implants.
Material and Methods: An epoxy resin completely edentulous mandibular model with three implants (OsseoLink USA LLC. 4 mm ×9 mm, internal connection type) with different angles (0 and 15 degrees) was used as reference model. Sixty stone casts were made from the reference model using three impression materials; polyether (PE, ImpregumTMSoft) Group 1, additional silicone (PVS, Enthus) Group 2 and vinyl siloxanether (VSXE, EXA'lence) Group 3 with two impression techniques indirect and direct technique. The inter-implant distances were measured for casts using a coordinate measuring machine and the deviations compared to the reference models were calculated. Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's Post-hoc test to detect significance between groups (P=0.05).
Results: Tukey's Post-hoc test in the indirect technique showed non-significant differences (p>0.05) between VSXE and PVS for ∆ r1 and ∆ r2 while showed significant differences (p> 0.05) between VSXE and PE also between PVS and PE for ∆ r1 and ∆ r2, while Tukey's Post-hoc test in the direct technique showed significant differences (p<0.05) between VSXE and PVS, between VSXE and PE and between PVS and PE groups for ∆ r1 and ∆ r2.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, for nonparallel implant conditions, the distortion values of casts produced by VSXE was significantly lower than casts produced by PVS, which was significantly lower than casts produced by PE in direct impression technique, while VSXE and PVS produced casts with more accuracy compared to casts produced by PE group in the indirect impression technique.

DOI

10.21608/edj.2018.77233

Keywords

dental implant, Impression material, Impression technique. This study was conducted at faculty of dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt after the approval of the Ethics committee of the faculty

Authors

First Name

Fadel

Last Name

Abd El-fattah

MiddleName

E.

Affiliation

Professor, Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Alam-Eldein

MiddleName

M.

Affiliation

Lecturer, Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University,

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Enas

Last Name

Elshenawy

MiddleName

A.

Affiliation

Demonstrator, Dental Biomaterials department, Faculty of dentistry, Tanta University.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

64

Article Issue

Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)

Related Issue

11454

Issue Date

2018-07-01

Receive Date

2020-03-13

Publish Date

2018-07-01

Page Start

2,501

Page End

2,511

Print ISSN

0070-9484

Online ISSN

2090-2360

Link

https://edj.journals.ekb.eg/article_77233.html

Detail API

https://edj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=77233

Order

11

Type

Original Article

Type Code

254

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Dental Journal

Publication Link

https://edj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023