Beta
17256

Comprehensive Assessment Of Two Compounds And Spraying Equipment For Controlling Citrus Brown Mite Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) ( Acari : Tetranychidae ) On Citrus Trees At Qalubia Province

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

In the present paper three factors  were assessed in controlling   citrus brown mite Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) on citrus trees  namely: Efficiency of  two  Acaricides  (Biomectin 5% EC as biocide and Dember 55%SC as chemical compound) ;  efficiency of two types of sprayers (Knapsack motor sprayer Arimitsu (740 L. /Fed.) and conventional motor sprayer Wisconson (1200 L. /Fed.) ; efficiency  of analytical method for the residue analysis of a novel Acaricide Biomectin 5% EC and its dissipation in the citrus fruits. The obtained results reported that,  Dember 55%SC was most effective than  Biomectin 5% EC by using   spraying  methods mentioned above,  the reduction percentages were, 92.17 % and 90.56 % for  Dember 55%SC by using Knapsack motor sprayer Arimitsu (740 L. /Fed.) and conventional motor sprayer Wisconson (1200 L. /Fed.), respectively, while the acaricides Biomectin 5% EC gaves reduction percentages, 88.31 % and 84.41 % by using Knapsack motor sprayer Arimitsu (740  L. /Fed.) and conventional motor sprayer Wisconson (1200 L. /Fed.), respectively. A satisfactory coverage was obtained on citrus trees and ground spray holders. The spectrum of droplets ranging between 111-177 microns (VMD). With sufficient number ranging from 54-224 N/cm².  Abamectin residues were extracted from orange samples and the extract was cleaned up according to QuEChERS method and determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with photo diode array detector (HPLC–DAD). The dissipation half-life time and the pre harvest interval (PHI) of abamectin residues in orange were 2.66 and 14.02 days, respectively in the case of Knapsack motor sprayer Arimitsu .  Whole in the case of conventional motor sprayer Wisconson were 4.85 and 14.1 days, respectively. These results, pointed to that the first method of spraying (Knapsack motor sprayer Arimitsu (740 L. /Fed.)) was more effective than the other method (conventional motor sprayer Wisconson (1200 L. /Fed.)

DOI

10.21608/eajbsf.2014.17256

Keywords

Ground application techniques, Residue, Mites, citrus

Authors

First Name

Halawa,

Last Name

M.

MiddleName

A.

Affiliation

Plant Protection Research Institute (PPRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC). Dokki; Giza; Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Tarek

Last Name

Abd-El Rahman

MiddleName

A .

Affiliation

Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center (ARC). Dokki; Giza; Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Rehab

Last Name

Dar

MiddleName

A.A.

Affiliation

Plant Protection Research Institute (PPRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC). Dokki; Giza; Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Nabila

Last Name

Hiekel

MiddleName

S .A.

Affiliation

Plant Protection Research Institute (PPRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC). Dokki; Giza; Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

6

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

3628

Issue Date

2014-12-01

Receive Date

2018-10-22

Publish Date

2014-12-01

Page Start

25

Page End

33

Print ISSN

2090-0864

Online ISSN

2090-0791

Link

https://eajbsf.journals.ekb.eg/article_17256.html

Detail API

https://eajbsf.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=17256

Order

4

Type

Original Article

Type Code

6

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, F. Toxicology & Pest Control

Publication Link

https://eajbsf.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023